Predicting rice blast disease: machine learning versus process-based models

BMC Bioinformatics

Roberto Confalonieri¹  Pau Puigdollers²  Dimitrios Katsantonis³  Argyris Kalaitzidis³  Natasa Sarafijanovic-Djukic⁴  David F. Nettleton⁴ 

[1] ESP, Cassandra Lab., Università degli Studi di Milano;GreenPowerMonitor;Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DEMETER, Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources;IRIS Advanced Engineering, Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia;

关键词: Rice blast;    forecasting;    machine learning;    predictive models;    rule induction;    neural networks;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12859-019-3065-1

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background In this study, we compared four models for predicting rice blast disease, two operational process-based models (Yoshino and Water Accounting Rice Model (WARM)) and two approaches based on machine learning algorithms (M5Rules and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)), the former inducing a rule-based model and the latter building a neural network. In situ telemetry is important to obtain quality in-field data for predictive models and this was a key aspect of the RICE-GUARD project on which this study is based. According to the authors, this is the first time process-based and machine learning modelling approaches for supporting plant disease management are compared. Results Results clearly showed that the models succeeded in providing a warning of rice blast onset and presence, thus representing suitable solutions for preventive remedial actions targeting the mitigation of yield losses and the reduction of fungicide use. All methods gave significant “signals” during the “early warning” period, with a similar level of performance. M5Rules and WARM gave the maximum average normalized scores of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively, whereas Yoshino gave the best score for one site (Kalochori 2015). The best average values of r and r2 and %MAE (Mean Absolute Error) for the machine learning models were 0.70, 0.50 and 0.75, respectively and for the process-based models the corresponding values were 0.59, 0.40 and 0.82. Thus it has been found that the ML models are competitive with the process-based models. This result has relevant implications for the operational use of the models, since most of the available studies are limited to the analysis of the relationship between the model outputs and the incidence of rice blast. Results also showed that machine learning methods approximated the performances of two process-based models used for years in operational contexts. Conclusions Process-based and data-driven models can be used to provide early warnings to anticipate rice blast and detect its presence, thus supporting fungicide applications. Data-driven models derived from machine learning methods are a viable alternative to process-based approaches and – in cases when training datasets are available – offer a potentially greater adaptability to new contexts.

【 授权许可】

Unknown