Continuous EEG monitoring by a new simplified wireless headset in intensive care unit

BMC Anesthesiology

Anselmo Caricato¹  Tiziana Benzi Markushi²  Nicola Montano³  Daniele Guerino Biasucci⁴  Eleonora Stival⁴  Eleonora Ioannoni⁴  Isabella Melchionda⁴  Serena Silva⁴  Camilla Gelormini⁴  Giacomo Della Marca⁵ 

[1] Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Catholic University School of Medicine;Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore;Department of Neurosurgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore;Neurosurgical Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS;Stroke Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS;

关键词: Electroencephalography;    Seizures;    Critical care;    Continuous EEG;    NeuroIntensive care;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12871-020-01213-5

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background In critically ill patients continuous EEG (cEEG) is recommended in several conditions. Recently, a new wireless EEG headset (CerebAir®,Nihon-Kohden) is available. It has 8 electrodes, and its positioning seems to be easier than conventional systems. Aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this device for cEEG monitoring, if positioned by ICU physician. Methods Neurological patients were divided in two groups according with the admission to Neuro-ICU (Study-group:20 patients) or General-ICU (Control-group:20 patients). In Study group, cEEG was recorded by CerebAir® assembled by an ICU physician, while in Control group a simplified 8-electrodes-EEG recording positioned by an EEG technician was performed. Results Time for electrodes applying was shorter in Study-group than in Control-group: 6.2 ± 1.1′ vs 10.4 ± 2.3′; p < 0.0001. Thirty five interventions were necessary to correct artifacts in Study-group and 11 in Control-group. EEG abnormalities with or without epileptic meaning were respectively 7(35%) and 7(35%) in Study-group, and 5(25%) and 9(45%) in Control-group;p > 0.05. In Study-group, cEEG was interrupted for risk of skin lesions in 4 cases after 52 ± 4 h. cEEG was obtained without EEG technician in all cases in Study-group; quality of EEG was similar. Conclusions Although several limitations should be considered, this simplified EEG system could be feasible even if EEG technician was not present. It was faster to position if compared with standard techniques, and can be used for continuous EEG monitoring. It could be very useful as part of diagnostic process in an emergency setting.

【 授权许可】

Unknown