Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment

BMC Geriatrics

Phoebe Ullrich¹  Klaus Hauer¹  Jürgen M. Bauer¹  Christian Werner²  Saskia Hummel³  Patrick Heldmann⁴ 

[1] AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Centre of the University of Heidelberg;Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University;Medical Faculty of the Heidelberg University;Network Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University;

关键词: Assessment;    Clinical trial methods;    Cognitive impairment;    Life-space mobility;    Measurement;    Exercise;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS) in geriatric patients. Methods Psychometric properties of the LSA-IS in 119 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.0 ± 6.2 years) with and without cognitive impairment (CI) [Mini-Mental State Examination: 22.4 ± 4.9 scores] were evaluated within a comprehensive validation design. For the total group and subgroups according to cognitive status, construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rho) with established construct variables, test–retest reliability by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity to change by standardized response means (SRMs) calculated for effects of early ward-based rehabilitation during hospital stay. Results The LSA-IS (total score) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC = .704), and large sensitivity to change (SRM = .806), while construct validity was small to high indicated by significant correlations of the LSA-IS to construct variables (rho = .208–716), depending on relative construct association. On average results of LSA-IS sub-scores confirmed results of the total score. Subgroups according to cognitive status did not differ for most analyzed variables. A completion rate of 100% and a completion time of 3.2 ± 1.2 min documented excellent feasibility. Conclusions The interview-based LSA-IS has proven to be valid, reliable, sensitive, and feasible in hospitalized, multi-morbid, geriatric patients with and without CI documenting good psychometric properties for institutionalized settings. Trial registration DRKS00016028

【 授权许可】

Unknown