期刊论文详细信息
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Full high-throughput sequencing analysis of differences in expression profiles of long noncoding RNAs and their mechanisms of action in systemic lupus erythematosus
Xuanxuan Hu1  Hui Ye1  Jianguang Wang1  Xiaoying Chu1  Xue Wang1  Xinyu Yang2  Zihan Wang3  Lei Wang4  Han Zhao4  Li Sun5  Minghua Jiang6  Hong Wang6 
[1] Department of Biochemistry, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University;Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University;School of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University;School of the Second Clinical Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University;The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University;
关键词: High-throughput sequencing analysis;    Expression profiles;    Long noncoding RNA;    Mechanisms;    Systemic lupus erythematosus;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13075-019-1853-7
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background The specific function of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the mechanism of their involvement in related pathological changes remain to be elucidated, so, in this study, we analyzed the differences in the expression profiles of lncRNAs and their mechanisms of action in SLE using full high-throughput sequencing, bioinformatics, etc. methods. Methods We used high-throughput sequencing to detect differences in the expression profiles of lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in PBMCs from patients with SLE at the genome-wide level. Next, we predicted target genes of 30 lincRNAs (long intergenic noncoding RNAs) by constructing a coexpression network of differential lincRNAs and mRNAs and identified the role of lincRNAs. Then, we analyzed the coexpression network of 23 optimized lincRNAs and their corresponding 353 miRNAs, evaluated the cis- and trans-effects of these lincRNAs, and performed GO and KEGG analyses of target genes. We also selected 8 lincRNAs and 2 newly discovered lncRNAs for q-PCR validation and lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA analysis. Finally, we also analyzed respectively the relation between lncRNAs and gender bias in SLE patients using RT-qPCR, the relation between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score and the “IFN signature” using ELISA, and the relation between the differential expression of lncRNAs and a change in the number of a cell type of PBMCs in SLE patients using RT-qPCR. Results The profiles of 1087 lncRNAs, 102 miRNAs, and 4101 mRNAs in PBMCs significantly differed between patients with SLE and healthy controls. The coexpression network analysis showed that the network contained 23 lincRNAs and 353 mRNAs. The evaluation of the cis- and trans-effects showed that the 23 lincRNAs acted on 704 target genes. GO and KEGG analyses of the target genes predicted the biological functions of the 23 lincRNAs. q-PCR validation showed 7 lincRNAs and 2 novel lncRNAs were identical to the sequencing results. The ceRNA network contained 7 validated lincRNAs, 15 miRNAs, and 155 mRNAs. In addition, the differential expression of lncRNAs may be gender dependent in SLE patients, SLE patients also exhibit a robust “IFN signature,” and PBMCs exhibiting differential expression of lncRNAs may be due to a change in the number of a cell type. Conclusion This work determined specific lncRNAs that play important biological functions in the pathogenesis of lupus and provided a new direction for diagnosis and treatment of disease.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次