Use of enantiomeric properties of sodium chlorate to assess primary and secondary nucleation under sonication

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Judy Lee¹  Fraser J. Armstrong²  Conor W. Copithorne-Crainey²  Madeleine Bussemaker² 

[1] Corresponding author.;Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom;

关键词: Sonocrystallization;    Primary nucleation;    Cavitation bubbles;    Chiral Crystallization;    Sonoluminescence;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Ultrasound is known to promote crystal nucleation, but despite significant research there remains uncertainty about how the mechanisms are affected. Despite the proposal of various primary nucleation theories, most studies provide no way to quantify or observe the extent to which primary nucleation is taking place, leaving open the possibility that sonocrystallisation is occurring by a secondary nucleation-driven mechanism. By utilising the widely reported enantiomeric properties of sodium chlorate, the extent to which ultrasound can induce primary nucleation can clearly be observed. It was demonstrated during seeded cooling crystallisation that when stirring the seed similarity was 99.3% on average, indicating secondary nucleation had almost exclusively taken place. The application of ultrasound however, decreased the seed similarity to 85.8% and 92.4% when applying 98 kHz and 200 kHz ultrasound respectively, clearly showing that primary nucleation had been induced and indicating the frequency dependency of the induced primary nucleation. This frequency dependency suggests a link between crystal nucleation and high intensity cavitation collisions and collapses, and the potential existence of a collapse/collision intensity threshold required to induce primary nucleation. In addition, secondary nucleation rate was investigated using anti-solvent crystallisation and was observed to increase with the application of ultrasound, though it appeared frequency independent (between 98 kHz & 200 kHz), suggesting that higher energy cavitational events are less important in inducing secondary nucleation or that a lower cavitation intensity threshold exists compared to primary nucleation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown