Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Haukur T. Gudmundsson¹  Bjorn R. Ludviksson²  Bjorn Gudbjornsson³  Karen E. Hansen⁴  Bjarni V. Halldorsson⁵ 

[1] Department of Medicine, Landspitali - University Hospital;Immunology and Centre for Rheumatology Research;Landspitali - University Hospital;Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health;School of Science and Engineering, Reykjavik University;

关键词: Clinical decision support system (CDSS);    Clinical guidelines;    Fracture risk;    Osteoporosis;    Treatment recommendations;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing osteoporosis at the point-of-care. The present study compares the treatment recommendations provided by OPAD, an expert physician and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients attending the outpatient osteoporosis clinic at the University Hospital in Iceland. We entered each patient’s data into the OPAD and recorded the OPAD diagnostic comments, 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and treatment options. We compared OPAD recommendations to those given by the osteoporosis specialist, and to those of the NOGG. Results Risk estimates made by OPAD were highly correlated with those from FRAX (r = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 1.00 without femoral neck BMD; r = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97, 0.99 with femoral neck BMD. Reassurance was recommended by the expert, NOGG and the OPAD in 68, 63 and 52% of cases, respectively. Likewise, intervention was recommended by the expert, NOGG, and the OPAD in 32, 37 and 48% of cases, respectively. The OPAD demonstrated moderate agreement with the physician (kappa 0.51, 95% CI 0.41, 0.61) and even higher agreement with NOGG (kappa 0.69, 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Conclusion Primary care physicians can use the OPAD to assess and treat patients’ skeletal health. Recommendations given by OPAD are consistent with expert opinion and existing guidelines.

【 授权许可】

Unknown