Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study

ESC Heart Failure

Tatiana Kuznetsova¹  František Sabovčik¹  Nicholas Cauwenberghs¹  Francois Haddad²  Yukari Kobayashi² 

[1]Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven Campus Sint Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 7, box 7001 Leuven B‐3000 Belgium

[2]Stanford Cardiovascular Institute Stanford CA USA

关键词: Population;    Echocardiography;    Diastolic dysfunction;    Grading approaches;    Prognosis;   

DOI  :  10.1002/ehf2.13863

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Aims Timely detection of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDDF) is of importance for precise risk stratification of asymptomatic subjects. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of LVDDF and its prognostic significance in the general population using two grading approaches: the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations and population‐derived, age‐specific criteria. Methods and results We randomly recruited 1407 community‐dwelling participants (mean age, 51.2 years; 51.1% women; 53.5% with cardiovascular risk factors). We measured left heart dimensions, strain, tricuspid regurgitation, transmitral blood flow, and mitral annular tissue velocities using conventional echocardiography and Doppler imaging. We utilized these measurements to grade of LVDDF according to the 2016 recommendations and population‐derived, age‐specific approach. According to the 2016 recommendations, 26 subjects (1.85%) were classified as having the advanced stage (Grade 2), whereas in 109 participants (7.75%) diastolic function was indeterminate. When applying the population‐derived criteria, the prevalence of advanced LVDDF was 17.9% (n = 252). During the follow‐up period (8.4 years), 100 participants experienced adverse cardiac events. After full adjustment, we did not observe any significant differences in the risk of events between subjects with indeterminate or any grade of LVDDF and subjects with normal diastolic function when classified according to the 2016 recommendation (P ≥ 0.25). In contrast, the adjusted risks of adverse cardiac events (HR = 1.28; P = 0.0045) were significantly elevated in participants with LVDDF when classified according to the population‐derived criteria. Conclusions Our study underscored the importance of considering age‐ and population‐derived thresholds in LVDDF grading in subjects at high cardiovascular risk which led to a better risk stratification and outcome prediction.

【 授权许可】

Unknown