CT perfusion based ASPECTS improves the diagnostic performance of early ischemic changes in large vessel occlusion

BMC Medical Imaging

Xianglan Jin¹  Chengwei Shao²  Luguang Chen²  Jianping Lu²  Tiegong Wang²  Qianwen Zhang²  Yuan Yuan² 

[1] Department of Cardiac Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine;Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University);

关键词: Stroke;    Perfusion imaging;    Tomography;    X-ray computed;    Prognosis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12880-021-00593-5

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background ASPECTS scoring method varies, but which one is most suitable for predicting the prognosis still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Automated (Auto)-, noncontrast CT (NCCT)- and CT perfusion (CTP) -ASPECTS for early ischemic changes (EICs) in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and to explore which scoring method is most suitable for predicting the clinical outcome. Methods Eighty-one patients with anterior circulation LVO were retrospectively enrolled and grouped as having a good (0–2) or poor (3–6) clinical outcome using a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Clinical characteristics and perfusion parameters were compared between the patients with good and poor outcomes. Differences in scores obtained with the three scoring methods were assessed. Diagnosis performance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the value of the three ordinal or dichotomized ASPECTS methods for predicting the clinical outcome. Results Sixty-three patients were finally included, with 36 (57.1%) patients having good clinical outcome. Significant differences were observed in the ordinal or dichotomized Auto-, NCCT- and CTP-ASPECTS between the patients with good and poor clinical outcomes (all p < 0.01). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of the ordinal and dichotomized CTP-ASPECTS were higher than that of the other two methods (all p < 0.01), but the AUCs of the Auto-ASPECTS was similar to that of the NCCT-ASPECTS (p > 0.05). Conclusions The CTP-ASPECTS is superior to the Auto- and NCCT-ASPECTS in detecting EICs in LVO. CTP-ASPECTS with a cutoff value of 6 is a good predictor of the clinical outcome at 90-day follow-up.

【 授权许可】

Unknown