Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Shahriar Faghani¹  Mehrnush Saghab Torbati²  Amir Valizadeh³  Mana Moassefi³  Zahra Maleki Ghorbani⁴  Reyhaneh Aghajani⁴  Seyed Hossein Hosseini Asl⁴  Amin Nakhostin-Ansari⁴ 

[1] Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Research Program (INRP), Tehran University of Medical Sciences;Islamic Azad University of Zahedan;Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences;Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences;

关键词: Rayyan;    Abstract screening;    Systematic reviews;    Methodology;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12874-022-01631-8

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Objective To evaluate the performance of the automated abstract screening tool Rayyan. Methods The records obtained from the search for three systematic reviews were manually screened in four stages. At the end of each stage, Rayyan was used to predict the eligibility score for the remaining records. At two different thresholds (≤2.5 and < 2.5 for exclusion of a record) Rayyan-generated ratings were compared with the decisions made by human reviewers in the manual screening process and the tool’s accuracy metrics were calculated. Results Two thousand fifty-four records were screened manually, of which 379 were judged to be eligible for full-text assessment, and 112 were eventually included in the final review. For finding records eligible for full-text assessment, at the threshold of < 2.5 for exclusion, Rayyan managed to achieve sensitivity values of 97-99% with specificity values of 19-58%, while at the threshold of ≤2.5 for exclusion it had a specificity of 100% with sensitivity values of 1-29%. For the task of finding eligible reports for inclusion in the final review, almost similar results were obtained. Discussion At the threshold of < 2.5 for exclusion, Rayyan managed to be a reliable tool for excluding ineligible records, but it was not much reliable for finding eligible records. We emphasize that this study was conducted on diagnostic test accuracy reviews, which are more difficult to screen due to inconsistent terminology.

【 授权许可】

Unknown