Irrational Delay Revisited: Examining Five Procrastination Scales in a Global Sample

Frontiers in Psychology

Frode Svartdal¹  Piers Steel² 

[1] Department of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway;Organizational Behaviour and Human Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada;

关键词: procrastination;    procrastination scale;    measurement;    confirmatory factor analysis;    item response theory;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01927

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Scales attempting to measure procrastination focus on different facets of the phenomenon, yet they share a common understanding of procrastination as an unnecessary, unwanted, and disadvantageous delay. The present paper examines in a global sample (N = 4,169) five different procrastination scales – Decisional Procrastination Scale (DPS), Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS), Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS), Adult Inventory of Procrastination Scale (AIP), and General Procrastination Scale (GPS), focusing on factor structures and item functioning using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The results indicated that The PPS (12 items selected from DPS, AIP, and GPS) measures different facets of procrastination even better than the three scales it is based on. An even shorter version of the PPS (5 items focusing on irrational delay), corresponds well to the nine-item IPS. Both scales demonstrate good psychometric properties and appear to be superior measures of core procrastination attributes than alternative procrastination scales.

【 授权许可】

Unknown