Measurement equivalence of the English, Chinese and Malay versions of the World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

卷:17

Yin Bun Cheung¹  Kok Joon Chong²  Eric Yin Hao Khoo²  Hwee Lin Wee³  Khung Keong Yeo⁴ 

[1] Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School;

[2] Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore;

[3] Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore;

[4] National Heart Centre Singapore;

关键词: Quality of life;    Equivalence;    Patient-reported outcomes;    Preference-based measures;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12955-019-1130-0

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background The WHOQOL-BREF is a widely used questionnaire for measuring quality of life. It is important to establish the measurement equivalence of various language versions of WHOQOL-BREF so that scores from different language versions may be pooled together. The primary aim of this article was to evaluate the measurement equivalence of the English, Chinese and Malay versions of the WHOQOL-BREF. Methods We analysed data from the previously published, cross-sectional, WONDERS study and used linear regression models to adjust for potential confounding variables. Based on equivalence clinical trial methods, measurement equivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence interval (CI) of differences in scores across language versions with a predefined equivalence margin of 0.3 SD. Equivalence was achieved if the 90% CI fell within 0.3 SD. Data from 1203 participants, aged above 21 years, were analysed. Results Participants who completed the different language versions of WHOQOL-BREF expectedly differed in age, ethnicity, highest education level, marital status, smoking status and Body Mass Index (BMI). The English and Malay language versions were definitely equivalent for all domains. The English and Chinese language versions were definitely equivalent for physical and environmental domains but inconclusive for psychological and social domains. Likewise, for Chinese and Malay versions. Conclusion The English, Chinese and Malay language versions of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire may be considered equivalent, with evidence being more robust for some domains than the others. Given the large number of people who speak/ read Chinese and Malay, this study has widespread relevance.

【 授权许可】

Unknown