The SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in High Income Countries Such as Canada: A Better Way Forward Without Lockdowns

Frontiers in Public Health

卷:9

Ari R. Joffe¹  David Redman² 

[1] Department of Pediatrics and John Dossetor Health Ethics Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;

[2] Retired LCol, Alberta Emergency Management Agency, St. Paul, AB, Canada;

关键词: COVID-19;    emergency management (EM);    lockdowns;    pandemic;    response;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpubh.2021.715904

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused tragic morbidity and mortality. In attempt to reduce this morbidity and mortality, most countries implemented population-wide lockdowns. Here we show that the lockdowns were based on several flawed assumptions, including “no one is protected until everyone is protected,” “lockdowns are highly effective to reduce transmission,” “lockdowns have a favorable cost-benefit balance,” and “lockdowns are the only effective option.” Focusing on the latter, we discuss that Emergency Management principles provide a better way forward to manage the public emergency of the pandemic. Specifically, there are three priorities including the following: first, protect those most at risk by separating them from the threat (mitigation); second, ensure critical infrastructure is ready for people who get sick (preparation and response); and third, shift the response from fear to confidence (recovery). We argue that, based on Emergency Management principles, the age-dependent risk from SARS-CoV-2, the minimal (at best) efficacy of lockdowns, and the terrible cost-benefit trade-offs of lockdowns, we need to reset the pandemic response. We can manage risk and save more lives from both COVID-19 and lockdowns, thus achieving far better outcomes in both the short- and long-term.

【 授权许可】

Unknown