期刊论文详细信息
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano 卷:17
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q) - Athlete Version
Constanza Pujals1  João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci1  Lenamar Fiorese Vieira2  José Roberto Andrade do Nascimento Junior2  Renan Codonhato2  Sophia Jowett3 
[1] Faculdade Ingá;
[2] Universidade Estadual de Maringá;
[3] Universidade de Loughborough;
关键词: psicologia do esporte;    psicometria;    relacionamento;   
DOI  :  10.5007/1980-0037.2015v17n6p635
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the Brazilianversion of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) - Athlete Version.For this, three studies were performed. In the first, four translators and five experts inSport Psychology adapted the CART-Q contents to the Brazilian context. In the second,364 athletes of individual and collective sports answered the adapted version of CART-Q.In the third, an independent sample of 185 athletes answered the CART-Q and the Taskand Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) to analyze the external validity ofthe instrument; and 50 athletes answered the CART-Q in two distinct moments for theanalysis of the temporal stability. Study 1 showed that the Portuguese version containsclear and relevant questions (CVC> 0.80). Study 2 showed that the CART-Q presentssatisfactory internal consistency (α> 0.70 / CC> 0.70). The confirmatory factor analysisshowed that the model with 11 items showed good fit [X2/gl = 3.03; CFI = 0.96, GFI =0.94; TLI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.08] and also the existence of the second-order model. Study3 showed the external (r> 0.40 with variable task orientation) and internal validity (CFAwith an independent sample) and temporal stability (ICC> 0.70). It was concluded that theBrazilian version for of CART-Q proved to be valid to evaluate the perception of athletesabout their relationship with the coach in the Brazilian sports context.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次