| BMC Infectious Diseases | 卷:22 |
| Efficacy of antiviral therapies for COVID-19: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials | |
| Kavitha Saravu1  Nitin Gupta1  Prasanth Balasubramanian2  Charan Thej Reddy Vegivinti2  Richa Chibbar3  Praneeth Reddy Keesari4  Yashwitha Sai Pulakurthi4  Caleb Zinn5  Izzet Akosman5  J. Karon5  Averi Barrett5  Lauren Siegel5  Kevin M. Kallmes5  Hannah Lyons5  Nicole Hardy5  Ranita Tarchand5  Kathryn Cowie5  Spandana Chittajallu6  Erin Sheffels7  Jillienne Touchette7  Bernadette Kane7  Kirk W. Evanson7  | |
| [1] Department of Infectious Disease, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education; | |
| [2] Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; | |
| [3] Department of Medicine, Lakeridge Health; | |
| [4] Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Center; | |
| [5] Nested Knowledge; | |
| [6] Reading Hospital; | |
| [7] Superior Medical Experts; | |
| 关键词: Systematic review; COVID-19; Antiviral; SARS-CoV-2; Therapeutic; Randomized controlled trial; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12879-022-07068-0 | |
| 来源: DOAJ | |
【 摘 要 】
Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to pose a significant threat to public health worldwide. The purpose of this study was to review current evidence obtained from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy of antivirals for COVID-19 treatment. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed to identify randomized controlled trials published up to September 4, 2021 that examined the efficacy of antivirals for COVID-19 treatment. Studies that were not randomized controlled trials or that did not include treatment of COVID-19 with approved antivirals were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) method. Due to study heterogeneity, inferential statistics were not performed and data were expressed as descriptive statistics. Results Of the 2,284 articles retrieved, 31 (12,440 patients) articles were included. Overall, antivirals were more effective when administered early in the disease course. No antiviral treatment demonstrated efficacy at reducing COVID-19 mortality. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir results suggested clinical improvement, although statistical power was low. Remdesivir exhibited efficacy in reducing time to recovery, but results were inconsistent across trials. Conclusions Although select antivirals have exhibited efficacy to improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients, none demonstrated efficacy in reducing mortality. Larger RCTs are needed to conclusively establish efficacy.
【 授权许可】
Unknown