Maintenance of low driving pressure in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome significantly affects outcomes

Respiratory Research

Ching-Min Wang¹  Kuo-Chen Cheng²  Chung-Han Ho³  Shu-Chen Kung⁴  Wan-Lin Chen⁴  Hui-Chun Chang⁵  Han-Shui Hsu⁶  Wei-Lun Liu⁷ 

[1] Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan;Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan;Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan;Department of Information Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan;Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan;Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St. Beitou Dist., 11221, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan;Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St. Beitou Dist., 11221, Taipei, Taiwan;Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, No.510, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., 242062, New Taipei City, Taiwan;Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan;

关键词: Acute respiratory distress syndrome;    Driving pressure;    Lung-protective ventilation strategy;    Outcome;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12931-021-01912-8

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundDriving pressure (∆P) is an important factor that predicts mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We test the hypothesis that serial changes in daily ΔP rather than Day 1 ΔP would better predict outcomes of patients with ARDS.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled patients admitted to five intensive care units (ICUs) at a medical center in Taiwan between March 2009 and January 2018 who met the criteria for ARDS and received the lung-protective ventilation strategy. ∆P was recorded daily for 3 consecutive days after the diagnosis of ARDS, and its correlation with 60-day survival was analyzed.ResultsA total of 224 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. The overall ICU and 60-day survival rates were 52.7% and 47.3%, respectively. ∆P on Days 1, 2, and 3 was significantly lower in the survival group than in the nonsurvival group (13.8 ± 3.4 vs. 14.8 ± 3.7, p = 0.0322, 14 ± 3.2 vs. 15 ± 3.5, p = 0.0194, 13.6 ± 3.2 vs. 15.1 ± 3.4, p = 0.0014, respectively). The patients were divided into four groups according to the daily changes in ∆P, namely, the low ∆P group (Day 1 ∆P < 14 cmH2O and Day 3 ∆P < 14 cmH2O), decrement group (Day 1 ∆P ≥ 14 cmH2O and Day 3 ∆P < 14 cmH2O), high ∆P group (Day 1 ∆P ≥ 14 cmH2O and Day 3 ∆P ≥ 14 cmH2O), and increment group (Day 1 ∆P < 14 cmH2O and Day 3 ∆P ≥ 14 cmH2O). The 60-day survival significantly differed among the four groups (log-rank test, p = 0.0271). Compared with the low ΔP group, patients in the decrement group did not have lower 60-day survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–1.68; p = 0.4448), while patients in the increment group had significantly lower 60-day survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.11–3.44; p = 0.0198).ConclusionsDaily ∆P remains an important predicting factor for survival in patients with ARDS. Serial changes in daily ΔP might be more informative than a single Day 1 ΔP value in predicting survival of patients with ARDS.

【 授权许可】

CC BY