期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
MedTAG: a portable and customizable annotation tool for biomedical documents
Gianmaria Silvello1  Fabio Giachelle1  Ornella Irrera1 
[1] Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy;
关键词: Biomedical annotation tools;    Entity extraction;    eHealth;    Digital health;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12911-021-01706-4
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundSemantic annotators and Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods for Named Entity Recognition and Linking (NER+L) require plenty of training and test data, especially in the biomedical domain. Despite the abundance of unstructured biomedical data, the lack of richly annotated biomedical datasets poses hindrances to the further development of NER+L algorithms for any effective secondary use. In addition, manual annotation of biomedical documents performed by physicians and experts is a costly and time-consuming task. To support, organize and speed up the annotation process, we introduce MedTAG, a collaborative biomedical annotation tool that is open-source, platform-independent, and free to use/distribute.ResultsWe present the main features of MedTAG and how it has been employed in the histopathology domain by physicians and experts to annotate more than seven thousand clinical reports manually. We compare MedTAG with a set of well-established biomedical annotation tools, including BioQRator, ezTag, MyMiner, and tagtog, comparing their pros and cons with those of MedTag. We highlight that MedTAG is one of the very few open-source tools provided with an open license and a straightforward installation procedure supporting cross-platform use.ConclusionsMedTAG has been designed according to five requirements (i.e. available, distributable, installable, workable and schematic) defined in a recent extensive review of manual annotation tools. Moreover, MedTAG satisfies 20 over 22 criteria specified in the same study.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202203048721964ZK.pdf 3422KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:1次