Dentists’ perceptions and usability testing toward the implementation of the ISAC, a comprehensive oral cancer intervention in dental practices: a qualitative study in Jazan region, Saudi Arabia

BMC Health Services Research

Ibtisam Moafa¹  Mohammed Jafer¹  Bart van den Borne²  Ciska Hoving² 

[1] Dental Public Health Division, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia;Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University/CAPHRI, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands;Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University/CAPHRI, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands;

关键词: Early detection of cancer;    Oral cancer;    Behavior change;    Public health dentistry;    Self-examination;    Think aloud;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-022-07586-2

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveWe aimed to explore dentists’ perceptions toward the implementation of a comprehensive intervention (ISAC) for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer in a dental clinic.MethodsThe ISAC intervention was presented to ten purposefully sampled dentists in Jazan Dental School (JDS). Participating dental interns were asked to practice the ISAC intervention whilst thinking aloud. A semi-structured interview technique was used to allow free expression of participants’ perceptions related to the ISAC intervention and to control the flow of topics. Fleuren’s framework theory informed the analysis. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the deductive-inductive framework analysis.ResultsPracticing the ISAC intervention was perceived to enhance the early detection and prevention of oral cancer. Serving community needs and engaging community groups were perceived to be related to a high relevance and compatibility of the ISAC intervention. Being a comprehensive intervention with well-defined objectives and being built on relevant data from the participants’ community and having dentists as a target group were the perceived relative advantages of the ISAC intervention compared to other programs. A supportive environment, gender-concordance, use of regional trainers, standard examination form and collaboration with other sectors were perceived to be the facilitators. Competition with clinical time, use of different examination forms and low organizational leader interests were perceived as impeding factors against effective implementation in a real-world context. Reward, easy to practice, feeling confidence and satisfaction, advertisement as well as use of a role model approach were perceived to be motivating factors.ConclusionsIntegrating data from representers of different participant groups during intervention conceptualization and development are critical for the intervention compatibility and acceptability. The study findings showed the opportunities of intertwining the intrinsic motivators of satisfaction and altruism existing in the target group and the extrinsic motivator of official diagnostic skill, certification that may boost and sustain the behavior change. Intervention features that influence perceived relevance, compatibility, relative advantage and motivation may be of great importance for intervention practice.

【 授权许可】

CC BY