Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Dario Gasbarra¹  Elja Arjas² 

[1] University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;

关键词: Superiority trial;    Phase II;    Phase III;    Adaptive design;    Likelihood principle;    Posterior inference;    Decision rule;    Frequentist performance;    Binary data;    Time-to-event data;    Vaccine efficacy trial;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12874-022-01526-8

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAdaptive designs offer added flexibility in the execution of clinical trials, including the possibilities of allocating more patients to the treatments that turned out more successful, and early stopping due to either declared success or futility. Commonly applied adaptive designs, such as group sequential methods, are based on the frequentist paradigm and on ideas from statistical significance testing. Interim checks during the trial will have the effect of inflating the Type 1 error rate, or, if this rate is controlled and kept fixed, lowering the power.ResultsThe purpose of the paper is to demonstrate the usefulness of the Bayesian approach in the design and in the actual running of randomized clinical trials during phase II and III. This approach is based on comparing the performance of the different treatment arms in terms of the respective joint posterior probabilities evaluated sequentially from the accruing outcome data, and then taking a control action if such posterior probabilities fall below a pre-specified critical threshold value. Two types of actions are considered: treatment allocation, putting on hold at least temporarily further accrual of patients to a treatment arm, and treatment selection, removing an arm from the trial permanently. The main development in the paper is in terms of binary outcomes, but extensions for handling time-to-event data, including data from vaccine trials, are also discussed. The performance of the proposed methodology is tested in extensive simulation experiments, with numerical results and graphical illustrations documented in a Supplement to the main text. As a companion to this paper, an implementation of the methods is provided in the form of a freely available R package ’barts’.ConclusionThe proposed methods for trial design provide an attractive alternative to their frequentist counterparts.

【 授权许可】

CC BY