Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy: an umbrella review protocol

Health Research Policy and Systems

Patricia O’Campo¹  Michelle Amri²  Ali Chatur³ 

[1]Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., M5T 1P8, Toronto, ON, Canada

[2]Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada

[3]Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., M5T 1P8, Toronto, ON, Canada

[4]Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard University, Boston, USA

[5]Health Studies, University College, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

关键词: Health in All Policies;    HiAP;    Healthy cities;    One Health;    Multisectoral;    Intersectoral;    Health;    Governance;    Healthy public policy;    Implementation;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-022-00826-1

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIt is widely recognized that one’s health is influenced by a multitude of nonmedical factors, known as the social determinants of health (SDH). The SDH are defined as “the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age, and which are shaped by the distribution of money, power and resources at global, national and local levels”. Despite their influence on health, most of the SDH are targeted through government departments and ministries outside of the traditional health sector (e.g. education, housing). As such, the need for intersectoral and multisectoral approaches arises. Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches are thought to be essential to addressing many global health challenges our world faces today and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. There are various ways of undertaking intersectoral and multisectoral action, but there are three widely recognized approaches (Health in All Policies [HiAP], Healthy Cities, and One Health) that each have a unique focus. However, despite the widespread acceptance of the need for intersectoral and multisectoral approaches, knowledge around how to support, achieve and sustain multisectoral action is limited. The goal of this study is to assemble evidence from systematic approaches to reviewing the literature (e.g. scoping review, systematic review) that collate findings on facilitators/enablers and barriers to implementing various intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health, to strengthen understanding of how to best implement health policies that work across sectors, whichever they may be.MethodsAn umbrella review (i.e. review of reviews) is to be undertaken to collate findings from the peer-reviewed literature, specifically from Ovid MEDLINE and Scopus databases. This umbrella review protocol was developed following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P), and study design informed by the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR).DiscussionCountries that employ multisectoral approaches are better able to identify and address issues around poverty, housing and others, by working collaboratively across sectors, with multisectoral action by governments thought to be required to achieve health equity.

【 授权许可】

CC BY