Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis

BMC Oral Health

Wenhao Ruan¹  Yuan Wu¹  Lifang Jiang¹  Wenjuan Yan¹  Ziting Zheng¹  Jiahui He¹  Jieli Sun² 

[1] Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Stomatology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China;

关键词: Endocrown;    Endodontically treated teeth;    3D finite element analysis;    Ceramic;    Composite resin;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-022-02063-y

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the stress distributions in endocrown restorations as applied to endodontically treated teeth (ETT), according to the factors of “margin design” (four levels) and “restorative material” (six levels).MethodsFour 3D-finite elements models were constructed for endocrown restored molars considering different margin designs. Model A was prepared with a flat butt joint margin and received an endocrown with a 2.0-mm occlusal thickness. Model B was prepared with a 20° bevel margin and received an endocrown with a 2.0-mm occlusal thickness. Model C was prepared with an axial reduction and 1-mm shoulder margin and received an endocrown with a 2.0-mm occlusal thickness. Model D was prepared with an anatomic margin and received an endocrown with a 2.0-mm occlusal thickness. The following endocrown materials were used: In-Ceram Zirconia (Zr), Vita Suprinity (VS), IPS Empress (IE), Grandio blocs (GR), VisCalor bulk (VS), and CopraPeek Light (CP). The Load application (600 N) was performed at the food bolus and tooth surface during the closing phase of the chewing cycle. The results for the endocrown and tooth remnants were determined according to the von Mises stress. The failure risk of the cement layer was also calculated based on the normal stress criterion.ResultsModel D (with an anatomic margin) showed the greatest stress concentrations, especially in the irregular and sharp angles of the restoration and tooth remnants. The stress concentrated on the dentin was significantly lower in Model B with a 20° bevel margin (20.86 MPa), i.e., 1.3 times lower than the other three margin designs (27.80 MPa). Restorative materials with higher elastic moduli present higher stress concentrations inside the endocrown and transmit less stress to the cement layer, resulting in lower bonding failure risks. In contrast, materials with an elastic modulus similar to that of dentin presented with a more homogeneous stress distribution on the whole structure.ConclusionsAn endocrown with a 20° bevel margin design could be a favorable preparation option for ETT. Composite resins (GR and VC) exhibit a more even stress distribution, and seem to be more promising materials for endocrown molars.

【 授权许可】

CC BY