An Integrative Approach to Clinical Decision-Making for Treating Patients With Binge-Eating Disorder

Frontiers in Psychology

article

Livia Chyurlia¹  Giorgio A. Tasca¹  Hany Bissada¹ 

[1] The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute;School of Psychology, University of Ottawa;Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa

关键词: binge-eating disorder;    eating disorders;    assessment;    patient factors;    case formulation;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02573

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Transtheoretical integrative decision-making models help clinicians to use patient factors that are known to predict outcomes in order to inform individualized treatment. Patient factors with a strong evidence base include: functional impairment, social support and interpersonal functioning, complexity and comorbidity, coping style, level of resistance, and level of subjective distress. Among those with binge-eating disorder (BED), patient factors have not been extensively characterized relative to norms or other clinical samples. We used an integrative decision-making model of these six patient factor domains related to patient outcomes to characterize a sample of 424 adults seeking treatment for BED. Data were from medical charts, a demographics questionnaire, and validated psychometric scales. We then compared these data to published data from normative and other eating disorder (ED) samples. Results showed that the average patient with BED: (1) was significantly more functionally impaired compared to non-clinical norms but somewhat less impaired than other patients with ED, (2) demonstrated clinically significant problems in social support and interpersonal functioning, (3) presented with complex comorbid pathology and high levels of chronicity, (4) used a more internalizing coping style compared to the norm and other ED samples, (5) had low levels of resistance to interventions, and (6) experienced a moderately high level of subjective distress indicating good motivation for treatment. Corresponding recommendations to these findings are that the average patient with BED should be provided higher intensity treatment that is longer in duration, interpersonally focused, directive in nature, and emphasizing self-reflection and insight. Despite the nomothetic nature of the findings, clinicians are encouraged to assess these patient domains when developing an ideographic case conceptualization and to tailor precision treatment to the individual patient with BED.

【 授权许可】

CC BY