The Effects of an Ecological Diversifying Experience on Creativity: An Experimental Study

Frontiers in Psychology

article

Alice Chirico¹  Sofia Carrara²  Sofia Bastoni²  Elena Gianotti²  Andrea Gaggioli² 

[1] Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano;Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano;Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano

关键词: creativity;    diversifying experience;    cognitive flexibility;    divergent thinking;    Torrance test;    dialogue in the dark;    schema violation;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01396

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Sometimes, life houses rare and unexpected events, such as moving abroad or meeting a special person unexpectedly. Recently, these situations have been indicated as “diversifying experiences” (DEs), defined as unusual and unexpected events that drag people outside their daily routine and accustomed schemas. The core mechanism of DEs would entail the disruption of our mental schema, which can facilitate unexpected connections among even distant ideas, thus enhancing people’s cognitive flexibility, that is, a key component of creative thinking. Despite both qualitative and lab-based studies have investigated the features of these experiences, an ecological assessment of their properties also in relation with creativity is still an open issue. The aim of this research is to study the DE–creativity link in a more ecological way, on the basis of a real-life disruptive experience of light deprivation. Specifically, we compared an ecological DE artistic established entertainment format (i.e., “dialogue in the dark,” which is seeing people perform several daily life activities but in the absence of light) with an equivalent experience in which the same activities were acted in the sunlight. The absence of light played the role of violating mechanism, framed within the ecological experiential format of the “dialogue in the dark.” We compared visitors’ emotional profile [Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), ad hoc Adjective Checklist], perceived impact of the experience [Centrality of Event Scale (CES)], and creative performance [Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)] in both groups of sighted people (in absence of light vs. in presence of light); and we also controlled for people’s openness to experience and need for cognitive closure, as dispositions. Results showed that (vs. control group) “dialogue in the dark” (i) led to worse creative performances, (ii) produced more intense positive affect, and (iii) resulted as a more impacting experience. Intense short-term impact of DE could have been detrimental for participants’ creativity. People may need more time to elaborate the DE and accommodate existing schema to generate more creative ideas. This is the first study proposing and succeeding in demonstrating the feasibility to investigate even real complex DEs in a controlled way, thus outlining how their link with creativity can take place in real life.

【 授权许可】

CC BY