The oncologist | |
Lenvatinib with or Without Everolimus in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapies | |
article | |
Andrew J. Wiele1  Pavlos Msaouel2  Nizar M. Tannir2  Tharakeswara K. Bathala4  Andrew W. Hahn1  Lianchun Xiao5  Munevver Duran1  Jeremy A. Ross1  Eric Jonasch2  Amishi Y. Shah2  Matthew T. Campbell2  | |
[1] Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center;Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center;Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center;Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center;Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | |
关键词: Renal cell carcinoma; Lenvatinib; Lenvatinib plus everolimus; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Cabozantinib; | |
DOI : 10.1002/onco.13770 | |
学科分类:地质学 | |
来源: AlphaMed Press Incorporated | |
【 摘 要 】
Introduction Lenvatinib (Len) plus everolimus (Eve) is an approved therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), but limited data exist on the efficacy of Len ± Eve after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and VEGFR-TKIs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with mRCC at our institution who were treated with Len ± Eve after ICI and VEGFR-TKI. A blinded radiologist assessed objective response as defined by RECIST version 1.1. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. Results Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 81.8% had clear-cell histology (ccRCC), and 76.4% had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium intermediate-risk disease. Median number of prior therapies was four (range, 2–10); all patients had prior ICIs and VEGFR-TKIs, and 80% were previously treated with ICI and at least two VEGFR-TKIs, including cabozantinib. One patient (1.8%) achieved a complete response, and 11 patients (20.0%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 21.8%; 35 patients (63.6%) achieved stable disease. In all patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–9.4) and median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months (95% CI, 8.8–16.0). In patients with ccRCC, ORR was 24.4%, PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.0–10.5), and OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.9–16.1). 50.9% of patients required dose reductions and 7.3% discontinued treatment because of toxicity. Conclusion Len ± Eve demonstrated meaningful clinical activity and tolerability in heavily pretreated patients with mRCC after disease progression with prior ICIs and VEGFR-TKIs. Implications for Practice As the therapeutic landscape for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma continues to evolve, this single-center, retrospective review highlights the real-world efficacy of lenvatinib with or without everolimus in heavily pretreated patients. This article supports the use of lenvatinib with or without everolimus as a viable salvage strategy for patients whose disease progresses after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies, including cabozantinib.
【 授权许可】
CC BY|CC BY-NC
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202108130001024ZK.pdf | 692KB | download |