Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate fall prevention interventions in community dwelling adults with cognitive impairment: a review and secondary analysis

BMC Geriatrics

L. Harrison¹  D. Sherifali²  R. Sztramko³  R. Lewis⁴  M. Jovkovic⁴  M. U. Ali⁵  M. Racey⁶  D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis⁶  H. Gagné⁷  J. Ploeg⁸  M. Markle-Reid⁹  S. Hunter^1,10 

[1] Caregiver Partner, Hamilton, Canada;Director, McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; and School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;Geriatric Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, Hamilton, Canada;McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; and School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;Prevention, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Toronto, Canada;School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University; and Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University; and Scientific Director, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada;

关键词: Fall prevention;    Cognitive impairment;    Older adults;    RE-AIM;    Implementation;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12877-021-02376-7

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundCognitive impairment (CI) is a risk factor for falls due to environmental or living settings, balance, gait and vision impairments, as well as medications. While previous systematic reviews have focused on the effectiveness of fall prevention programs in adults with cognitive impairment, very limited information is available on their implementation. This review examines what aspects of fall prevention interventions for community-dwelling adults with CI have been reported using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to support successful implementation.MethodsWe examined the included studies from our systematic review, which searched 7 databases for primary and secondary fall prevention interventions involving community-dwelling adults ≥50 years with mild to moderate CI. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data for study characteristics and the 5 dimensions (62 criteria) of the RE-AIM framework.ResultsTwelve randomized or clinical controlled trials (RCTs/CCTs) consisting of 8 exercise interventions, 3 multifactorial interventions, and 1 medication treatment were included in the review. Only 4 of 62 criteria were reported by all 12 included studies and 29 criteria were not reported by any of the studies. Five of the included studies reported on 20 or more of the 62 possible RE-AIM criteria and 3 of these studies self-identified as “feasibility” studies. While Reach was the best-reported construct by the included studies, followed by Effectiveness and Implementation, the criteria within the Adoption and Maintenance constructs were rarely mentioned by these studies. In general, there was also wide variation in how each of the criteria were reported on by study authors.ConclusionBased on the reporting of RE-AIM components in this review, we are unable to make connections to successful intervention components and thus practice-based recommendations for fall prevention in those with CI. The lack of detail regarding implementation approaches greatly limits the interpretation and comparisons across studies to fully inform future research efforts.

【 授权许可】

CC BY