Evaluating the implementation of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management program using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a case study

BMC Health Services Research

Christopher J. Licskai¹  Stefan Paciocco²  Madonna Ferrone³  Shannon L. Sibbald⁴  Anita Kothari⁵ 

[1] Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada;Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Canada;RRT-CRE, Asthma Research Group Inc., London, Canada;School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada;School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada;

关键词: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;    Implementation science;    Implementation evaluation;    Consolidated framework for Implementation research;    Case study;    Chronic disease management;    Primary healthcare;    Interprofessional teams;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-021-06636-5

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent chronic disease that requires comprehensive approaches to manage; it accounts for a significant portion of Canada’s annual healthcare spending. Interprofessional teams are effective at providing chronic disease management that meets the needs of patients. As part of an ongoing initiative, a COPD management program, the Best Care COPD program was implemented in a primary care setting. The objectives of this research were to determine site-specific factors facilitating or impeding the implementation of a COPD program in a new setting, while evaluating the implementation strategy used.MethodsA qualitative case study was conducted using interviews, focus groups, document analysis, and site visits. Data were deductively analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to assess the impact of each of its constructs on Best Care COPD program implementation at this site.ResultsEleven CFIR constructs were determined to meaningfully affect implementation. Five were identified as the most influential in the implementation process. Cosmopolitanism (partnerships with other organizations), networks and communication (amongst program providers), engaging (key individuals to participate in program implementation), design quality and packaging (of the program), and reflecting and evaluating (throughout the implementation process). A peer-to-peer implementation strategy included training of registered respiratory therapists (RRT) as certified respiratory educators and the establishment of a communication network among RRTs to discuss experiences, collectively solve problems, and connect with the program lead.ConclusionsThis study provides a practical example of the various factors that facilitated the implementation of the Best Care COPD program. It also demonstrates the potential of using a peer-to-peer implementation strategy. Focusing on these factors will be useful for informing the continued spread and success of the Best Care COPD program and future implementation of other chronic care programs.

【 授权许可】

CC BY