| Cancer Communications | |
| Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis | |
| article | |
| Yanli Hou1  Bin Wu2  | |
| [1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University;Medical Decision and Economic Group, Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, South Campus, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University | |
| 关键词: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Atezolizumab; Bevacizumab; Sorafenib; Cost-effectiveness; | |
| DOI : 10.1002/cac2.12110 | |
| 学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide and accounted for 8.9% of all neoplasms, as shown by the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprises 75%-85% of liver cancers [2]. The abysmal statistic is partly contributed by the fact that only 30%-40% of all patients are diagnosed at early stages that are amenable to potentially curative treatments [3]. For over a decade, the availability of new agents, such as lenvatinib- and sorafenib-based targeted therapy, has significantly improved the outcome of patients with advanced HCC, prolonging the median overall survival (OS) from 4-8 months to 10-15 months [4, 5]. However, the therapeutic options for advanced HCC are still limited, and the prognosis is poor.
【 授权许可】
CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202108090004480ZK.pdf | 124KB |
PDF