Communicating and Understanding Ecosystem Services Assessment With Coastal Stakeholders: Obstacles and Opportunities

Frontiers in Communication

Scott C. Hagen¹  Sonia H. Stephens²  Denise E. DeLorme³  David W. Yoskowitz⁴  Renee C. Collini⁵ 

[1] Civil and Environmental Engineering/Center for Coastal Resiliency, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States;Department of English, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States;Department of Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States;Harte Research Institute, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX, United States;Mississippi State University, Mississippi-Alabama and Florida Sea Grant, Biloxi, MS, United States;

关键词: ecosystem services;    stakeholder engagement;    environmental communication;    coupled natural and human system;    coastal resilience;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fcomm.2021.656884

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

This paper reports on insights and lessons learned from stakeholder engagement, particularly focus groups, conducted during a multi-year, NOAA-sponsored transdisciplinary project. A major project goal was to demonstrate and communicate benefits of natural and nature-based features (NNBFs) (e.g., barrier islands, dunes, and marshes) in the northern Gulf of Mexico region through the lens of economic impacts and ecosystem services. Overall, the findings indicate economic impacts and ecosystem services can be challenging topics to communicate because of complexity in conceptualization and valuation. From our experiences, we recommend using “ecosystem services assessment” (ESA), a more encompassing, accurate, and understandable term to stakeholders. ESA recognizes the integrated human (or built) and natural ecosystem and holistic benefits provided by and to both. The paper concludes with a discussion of future research opportunities for improving ESA-oriented science and outreach.

【 授权许可】

CC BY