Human–Autonomy Teaming: Definitions, Debates, and Directions

Frontiers in Psychology

Joseph B. Lyons¹  August Capiola¹  Katia Sycara²  Michael Lewis³ 

[1] Air Force Research Laboratory, Dayton, OH, United States;School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States;School of Computing and Information, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States;

关键词: human–autonomy team;    autonomy;    team;    human factors;    robotics;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Researchers are beginning to transition from studying human–automation interaction to human–autonomy teaming. This distinction has been highlighted in recent literature, and theoretical reasons why the psychological experience of humans interacting with autonomy may vary and affect subsequent collaboration outcomes are beginning to emerge (de Visser et al., 2018; Wynne and Lyons, 2018). In this review, we do a deep dive into human–autonomy teams (HATs) by explaining the differences between automation and autonomy and by reviewing the domain of human–human teaming to make inferences for HATs. We examine the domain of human–human teaming to extrapolate a few core factors that could have relevance for HATs. Notably, these factors involve critical social elements within teams that are central (as argued in this review) for HATs. We conclude by highlighting some research gaps that researchers should strive toward answering, which will ultimately facilitate a more nuanced and complete understanding of HATs in a variety of real-world contexts.

【 授权许可】

CC BY