A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction endorsed by the International Society of Electrocardiology and the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology: the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc

article

Yochai Birnbaum¹  Miguel Fiol²  Kjell Nikus³  Javier Garcia Niebla⁵  Ljuba Bacharova⁶  Sergio Dubner⁸  Wojciech Zareba⁹  Peter W. Macfarlane^1,10  Antonio Luiz Ribeiro^1,11  Iwona Cygankiewicz^1,12  Antoni Bayes de Luna^1,13 

[1] The Department of Medicine, The Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine;Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Hospital Son Espases;Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Finnish Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Tampere;Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital;Valle del Golfo Health Center;International Laser Center;Institute of Pathophysiology, Medical School, Comenius University;Clinica y Maternidad Suizo Argentina and De Los Arcos Sanatorio;Division of Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center;Electrocardiology Section, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow;Internal Medicine Department, School of Medicine, and Telehealth Center, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais;Department of Electrocardiology, Medical University of Lodz;Cardiovascular ICCC- Program, Research Institute Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Cardiovascular Research Foundation

关键词: electrocardiography;    epidemiology/clinical trials;    non-invasive techniques;   

DOI  :  10.1111/anec.12786

来源: Wiley

【 摘 要 】

In this rapidly changing age, with virtually all information available on the Internet including courses, students may not find any reason to physically attend the lectures. In spite of the many benefits the online lectures and materials bring to teaching, this drift from the traditional (norm) face-to-face lectures is also creating further barriers, such as difficulty in communicating and building personal relationships, between students and instructor. In this paper we carry out a study that presents and analyzes factors that motivate students to attend a (1) face-to-face instruction in-class versus an (2) online class. This study is based on an anonymous and voluntary survey that was conducted in the School of Engineering at University of Victoria, BC, Canada. This paper presents and shares the detailed results and analysis of this survey that also includes some interesting and useful comments from the students. Based on the results, analysis and comments the paper suggests methodologies of how to improve face-to-face in-class instructions to make them more relevant to the current global information age.

【 授权许可】

Unknown