MSF experiences of providing multidisciplinary primary level NCD care for Syrian refugees and the host population in Jordan: an implementation study guided by the RE-AIM framework

BMC Health Services Research

Bayard Roberts¹  Éimhín Ansbro¹  Pablo Perel¹  Tobias Homan²  Karla Bil³  Jamil Qasem⁴  Kiran Jobanputra⁵  Mohammed Rasoul Tarawneh⁶ 

[1] Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;Médecins sans Frontières, Amman, Jordan;Médecins sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Médecins sans Frontières, Irbid, Jordan;Médecins sans Frontières, London, UK;Noncommunicable Disease Directorate, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan;

关键词: Non communicable disease;    Diabetes;    Hypertension;    Cardiovascular disease;    Humanitarian;    Conflict;    Effectiveness;    Refugee;    Syria;    Jordan;    Programme;    RE-AIM;    Evaluation;    Implementation;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-021-06333-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn response to the rising global NCD burden, humanitarian actors have rapidly scaled-up NCD services in crisis-affected low-and-middle income countries. Using the RE-AIM implementation framework, we evaluated a multidisciplinary, primary level model of NCD care for Syrian refugees and vulnerable Jordanians delivered by MSF in Irbid, Jordan. We examined the programme’s Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption and acceptance, Implementation and Maintenance over time.MethodsThis mixed methods retrospective evaluation, undertaken in 2017, comprised secondary analysis of pre-existing cross-sectional household survey data; analysis of routine cohort data from 2014 to 2017; descriptive costing analysis of total annual, per-patient and per-consultation costs for 2015–2017 from the provider-perspective; a clinical audit; a medication adherence survey; and qualitative research involving thematic analysis of individual interviews and focus group discussions.ResultsThe programme enrolled 23% of Syrian adult refugees with NCDs in Irbid governorate. The cohort mean age was 54.7 years; 71% had multi-morbidity and 9.9% self-reported a disability. The programme was acceptable to patients, staff and stakeholders. Blood pressure and glycaemic control improved as the programme matured and by 6.6 mmHg and 1.12 mmol/l respectively within 6 months of patient enrolment. Per patient per year cost increased 23% from INT$ 1424 (2015) to 1751 (2016), and by 9% to 1904 (2017). Cost per consultation increased from INT$ 209 to 253 (2015–2017). Staff reported that clinical guidelines were usable and patients’ self-reported medication adherence was high. Individual, programmatic and organisational challenges to programme implementation and maintenance included the impact of war and the refugee experience on Syrian refugees’ ability to engage; inadequate low-cost referral options; and challenges for MSF to rapidly adapt to operating in a highly regulated and complex health system. Essential programme adaptations included refinement of health education, development of mental health and psychosocial services and addition of essential referral pathways, home visit, physiotherapy and social worker services.ConclusionRE-AIM proved a valuable tool in evaluating a complex intervention in a protracted humanitarian crisis setting. This multidisciplinary programme was largely acceptable, achieving good clinical outcomes, but for a limited number of patients and at relatively high cost. We propose that model simplification, adapted procurement practices and use of technology could improve cost effectiveness without reducing acceptability, and may facilitate replication.

【 授权许可】

CC BY