期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Low health literacy is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany
Dagmar Lühmann1  Daniel Tajdar1  Ingmar Schäfer1  Tim Steinberg1  Hendrik van den Bussche1  Martin Scherer1  Regina Fertmann2 
[1] Department of Primary Care at Hamburg University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany;Hamburg Authority of Health and Consumer Protection, Hamburg, Germany;
关键词: Type 2 diabetes;    Prevention;    Diabetes risk;    Health literacy;    GDRS;    HLS-EU-Q16;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-021-10508-2
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundLow health literacy is believed to be associated with behaviours that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. But there is limited knowledge on the relation between health literacy (HL) and diabetes risk, and whether improving HL could be a potential prevention strategy. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to examine the link between HL and diabetes risk among non-diabetic adults.MethodsWe used data from the Hamburg Diabetes Prevention Survey, a population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. One thousand, two hundred and fifty-five non-diabetic subjects aged 18–60 years were eligible. The German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS, ranging 0 to 123 points) was used to determine the individual risk of type 2 diabetes. The short version of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16, ranging 0 to 16 points) was applied to assess the individual self-reported HL. Subjects were asked to self-estimate their diabetes risk, which was then compared with the calculated GDRS. Descriptive statistics were calculated to investigate group differences in the GDRS and self-estimated diabetes risk. Linear as well as logistic regression models were performed to analyse potential influencing variables of the GDRS as well as incorrect self-estimated diabetes risk. In three nested statistical models for each outcome, these analyses were adjusted for age, gender, educational level and the presence of chronic conditions.ResultsAccording to the criteria of the GDRS, 996 (79.4%) subjects showed “low risk”, 176 (14.0%) “still low risk”, 53 (4.2%) “elevated risk”, and 30 (2.4%) “high to very high risk” to develop type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years. In the statistical models including all control variables, subjects with “inadequate HL” scored 2.38 points higher on the GDRS (95% CI 0.378 to 4.336; P = 0.020) and had a 2.04 greater chance to estimate their diabetes risk incorrectly (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.33 to 3.14; P = 0.001) compared to those with “sufficient HL”.ConclusionThe risk of type 2 diabetes is increased in people with inadequate self-reported HL. People with high diabetes risk and inadequate HL might be provided with educational programs to improve diabetes knowledge and reduce behavioural risk factors.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202107027389494ZK.pdf 895KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次