期刊论文详细信息
Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Comparison between Rowatinex and Tamsulosin as a Medical Expulsion Therapy for Ureteral Stone
ARTICLE
Ghassan S.Ahmed1  Kassim J. Al-Shamma2  Majeed M.Asghar3 
[1] Department of Pharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Basra University;Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Baghdad University;Department of Clinical Urology, College of Medicine, Basra University
关键词: Ureteric stone;    Tamsulosin;    Rowatinex;    Medical expulsion therapy.;   
DOI  :  10.31351/vol22iss1pp1-4
学科分类:计算机网络和通讯
来源: College of Pharmacy University of Baghdad
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rowatinex and tamsulosin in the treatment of patients with ureteric stone. Forty patients with ureteric stone ranged (4- 12) mm, were included in this study. They were randomized into two groups where the first group includes twenty patients treated with Rowatinex three times daily (Group 1), and the second group includes twenty patients treated with tamsulosin 0.4mg/day (Group 2). All patients were randomly assigned to receive the designed standard medical therapy for a maximum of 3 weeks. Each group was given an antibiotic as prophylaxis and an injectable non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used on demand. At the outpatient clinic all subjects were assessed by CT-scan at baseline and evaluated every 7 days by physical examination, plain abdominal X-ray (KUB), and abdominal ultrasonography. Data were analyzed by using Student t-test method to compare the results; differences in the success rate between treatments were compared with the chi-square test for 2× 2 tables. The results showed that tamsulosin significantly increases the expulsion rate, and reduce expulsion time of ureteric stone when compared with rowatinex group. Tamsulosin results in a better control of renal colic pain, and decreases in endoscopic procedures performed to remove the stone.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202106100003157ZK.pdf 327KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次