期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Modified Usability Framework for Disaster Apps: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of User Reviews
Graham Leonard1  Raj Prasanna2  Emma E. H. Doyle2  Marion Lara Tan2  David Johnston2  Kristin Stock3 
[1] GNS Science, Avalon, 5010, Lower Hutt, New Zealand;Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, 6021, Wellington, New Zealand;School of Natural and Computational Sciences, Massey University, 0632, Albany, New Zealand;
关键词: Disaster apps;    End-user perspective;    Human–computer interaction;    Usability;   
DOI  :  10.1007/s13753-020-00282-x
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The public has access to a range of mobile applications (apps) for disasters. However, there has been limited academic research conducted on disaster apps and how the public perceives their usability. This study explores end-users’ perceptions of the usability of disaster apps. It proposes a conceptual framework based on insights gathered from thematically analyzing online reviews. The study identifies new usability concerns particular to disaster apps’ use: (1) content relevance depends on the app’s purpose and the proximate significance of the information to the hazard event’s time and location; (2) app dependability affects users’ perceptions of usability due to the life-safety association of disaster apps; (3) users perceive advertisements to contribute to their cognitive load; (4) users expect apps to work efficiently without unnecessary consumption of critical phone resources; (5) appropriate audio interface can improve usability, as sounds can boost an app’s alerting aspect; and, finally (6) in-app browsing may potentially enhance users’ impression of the structure of a disaster app. As a result, this study argues for focussed research and development on public-facing disaster apps. Future research should consider the conceptual framework and concerns presented in this study when building design guidelines and theories for disaster apps.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202104281643342ZK.pdf 1507KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:5次