3D - Printed Patient Specific Instrumentation in Corrective Osteotomy of the Femur and Pelvis: A Review of the Literature

3D Printing in Medicine

Sima Zakani¹  Kishore Mulpuri²  Njalalle Baraza³  Chris Chapman⁴ 

[1] BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, BC Children’s Hospital, 1D.66-4480 Oak Street, V6H 3V4, Vancouver, BC, Canada;Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, BC Children’s Hospital, 1D.66-4480 Oak Street, V6H 3V4, Vancouver, BC, Canada;Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brookdale Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA;

关键词: Patient specific instrumentation;    3D printing;    Orthopaedic surgery;    Femoral osteotomy;    Pelvic osteotomy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s41205-020-00087-0

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe paediatric patient population has considerable variation in anatomy. The use of Computed Tomography (CT)-based digital models to design three-dimensionally printed patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has recently been applied for correction of deformity in orthopedic surgery. This review sought to determine the existing application of this technology currently in use within paediatric orthopaedics, and assess the potential benefits that this may provide to patients and surgeons.MethodsA review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for published literature, as well as Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov for grey literature. The search strategy revolved around the research question: “What is the clinical impact of using 3D printed PSI for proximal femoral or pelvic osteotomy in paediatric orthopaedics?” Two reviewers, using predetermined inclusion criteria, independently performed title and abstract review in order to select articles for full text review. Data extracted included effect on operating time and intraoperative image use, as well as osteotomy and screw positioning accuracy. Data were combined in a narrative synthesis; meta-analysis was not performed given the diversity of study designs and interventions.ResultsIn total, ten studies were included: six case control studies, three case series and a case report. Five studies directly compared operating time using PSI to conventional techniques, with two showing a significant decrease in the number of intraoperative images and operative time. Eight studies reported improved accuracy in executing the surgical plan compared to conventional methods.ConclusionCompared to conventional methods of performing femoral or pelvic osteotomy, use of PSI has led to improved accuracy and precision, decreased procedure times, and decreased intra-operative imaging requirements. Additionally, the technology has become more cost effective and accessible since its initial inception and use.

【 授权许可】

CC BY