Automatic analysis of summary statements in virtual patients - a pilot study evaluating a machine learning approach

BMC Medical Education

Isabel Kiesewetter¹  Martin Adler²  Inga Hege³ 

[1] Department of Anaesthesiology, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany;Instruct gGmbH, Kapuzinerstr.5, 80337, Munich, Germany;Medical Education Sciences, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;Institute for Medical Education, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany;

关键词: Clinical reasoning;    Summary statement;    Virtual patients;    Natural language processing;    Machine learning;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-020-02297-w

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe ability to compose a concise summary statement about a patient is a good indicator for the clinical reasoning abilities of healthcare students. To assess such summary statements manually a rubric based on five categories - use of semantic qualifiers, narrowing, transformation, accuracy, and global rating has been published. Our aim was to explore whether computer-based methods can be applied to automatically assess summary statements composed by learners in virtual patient scenarios based on the available rubric in real-time to serve as a basis for immediate feedback to learners.MethodsWe randomly selected 125 summary statements in German and English composed by learners in five different virtual patient scenarios. Then we manually rated these statements based on the rubric plus an additional category for the use of the virtual patients’ name. We implemented a natural language processing approach in combination with our own algorithm to automatically assess 125 randomly selected summary statements and compared the results of the manual and automatic rating in each category.ResultsWe found a moderate agreement of the manual and automatic rating in most of the categories. However, some further analysis and development is needed, especially for a more reliable assessment of the factual accuracy and the identification of patient names in the German statements.ConclusionsDespite some areas of improvement we believe that our results justify a careful display of the computer-calculated assessment scores as feedback to the learners. It will be important to emphasize that the rating is an approximation and give learners the possibility to complain about supposedly incorrect assessments, which will also help us to further improve the rating algorithms.

【 授权许可】

CC BY