| European Journal of Medical Research | |
| Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults | |
| Xiao-Xia Song1  Hua Zhang1  Hua Fan1  Ye Sun1  | |
| [1] Emergency Department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No.2 of Yinghua East Street, Chaoyang District, 100029, Bejing, China; | |
| 关键词: Endotracheal intubation; Holder; Teeth pad; Critical illness; Intensive care unit (ICU); | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s40001-020-00446-x | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundThe present study aimed to compare three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation.MethodsThrough literature retrieval, the effects of the adhesive/twill tape method, fixator method, and adhesive/twill tape–fixator alternation method on patients with tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) were compared.ResultsThe fixator and alternation methods were more effective in protecting the tongue mucosa and teeth. The alternation method was superior to the other two methods in maintaining the position of the endotracheal intubation. However, the difference in facial and lip injuries between the three methods was not statistically significant.ConclusionThe fixator method can significantly reduce intraoral injury and is more suitable for older people with weak tongue mucosa and loose teeth. These are worth popularizing among a wider group.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202104263174170ZK.pdf | 1149KB |
PDF