Survival outcomes in men with a positive family history of prostate cancer: a registry based study

BMC Cancer

Martin Borg¹  Michael E. O’Callaghan²  Mann Ang³ 

[1] South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;Adelaide Radiotherapy Centre, GenesisCare, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;Discipline of Medicine, Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men’s Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;Flinders Medical Centre, Urology Unit, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, SA 5042, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia;The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;

关键词: Prostate Cancer;    Family history;    Survival;    Outcomes;    Genetics;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12885-020-07174-9

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTo investigate the correlation between family history of prostate cancer (PCa) and survival (overall and cancer specific) in patients undergoing treatment for PCa.Methodsine thousand four hundred fifty-nine patients with PCa were extracted from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative (SA-PCCOC) database. Diagnosis occurred after 1998 and treatment before 2014. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used to assess the effect of family history on overall survival after adjustment for confounders (age at diagnosis, NCCN risk category and year of treatment), and with stratification by primary treatment group. Competing risks regression modelling was used to assess PCa specific mortality.ResultsMen with a positive family history of PCa appear to have a lower Gleason score at the time of diagnosis (50% with Gleason < 7, compared to 39% in those without family history) and be diagnosed at a lower age (64 vs 69). Men with a positive family history of PCa appear to have better overall survival outcomes (p < 0.001, log rank test). In analysis adjusting for age at diagnosis, NCCN risk category and year of treatment, family history remained a significant factor when modelling overall survival (HR 0.72 95% CI 0.55–0.95, p = 0.021).There were no significant differences in treatment subgroups of radical prostatectomy (p = 0.7) and radiotherapy (0.054).ConclusionMen with a positive family history of PCa appear to have better overall survival outcomes. This better survival may represent lead time bias and early initiation of PSA screening. Family history of PCa was not associated with different survival outcomes in men who were treated with either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

【 授权许可】

CC BY