Diagnostic accuracy comparison between clinical signs and hemoglobin color scale as screening methods in the diagnosis of anemia in children

Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil

Luciana Pedrosa Leal¹  Mônica M. Osório¹ 

[1] ,Universidade Federal de PernambucoRecife PE ,Brazil

关键词: Anemia;    Hemoglobins;    Diagnosis;    Child;    Anemia;    Hemoglobinas;    Diagnóstico;    Criança;   

DOI  :  10.1590/S1519-38292006000200005

来源: SciELO

【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVES: to compare the validity and reproducibility of clinical signs with the World Health Organization hemoglobin color scale. METHODS: Two hundred six children in the age range of 6-23 months, at the Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira, IMIP, were assessed. Two examiners evaluated the clinical signs and the hemoglobin color scale of each child at the different times. The hemoglobin value was used as a standard for validation. RESULTS: in more than 90% of cases the agreement between the values of the color scale and the laboratorial hemoglobin was <2 g/dL. Between the clinical signs the highest sensitivity level for diagnosing Hb<11 g/dL was presented by the hemoglobin color scale (75.7%). For moderate/severe anemia Hb<9g/dL the highest sensitivity was shown by combined palmar or conjunctival pallor (74.3%) and by the color scale (52.5%), according to the first and second observer, respectively. The highest specificity level for Hb<11 g/dL was presented by palmar pallor in comparison with the mother's palm and conjunctival pallor (100%). For Hb<9 g/dL the highest specificity was presented by the hemoglobin color scale (91.9%). CONCLUSIONS: this study suggests that moderate/severe anemia can be diagnosed either by clinical signs or by the color scale, while, in cases of mild anemia, the better diagnosis tool appears to be the color scale.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License