History and Philosophy of Science: a Phylogenetic approach

História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos

James G. Lennox¹ 

[1] ,University of Pittsburgh Center for Philosophy of Science Department of History and Philosophy of Science

关键词: History and Philosophy of Science;    Phylogenetic;    normativism;    naturalism;    história e filosofia da ciência;    filogenética;    normativismo;    naturalismo;   

DOI  :  10.1590/S0104-59702001000400008

来源: SciELO

【 摘 要 】

In the aftermath of Thomas Kuhn's The structure of scientific revolutions, there was a great deal of discussion about the relationship between the History of Science and the Philosophy of Science. A wider issue was at stake in these discussions: 'normativism' versus 'naturalism' in Epistemology. If the History of Science, at best, gives us reliable information about what actually occurred historically, how can it inform debates about such things as confirmation or explanation in Philosophy of Science? This essay makes a case for the centrality of historical investigation in the Philosophy of Science. I will defend what I term the 'Phylogenetic' approach to the Philosophy of Science. I will argue that since the foundations and dominant methods of a particular scientific field are shaped by its history, studying that History can give us considerable insight into conceptual and methodological problems in a particular Science. The case will be made both on general, philosophical grounds, and by compelling instantiation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License