Critical analysis of scientific publications of the Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia from 2006 to 2010

Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia

Eduardo Angeli Malavolta²  Riccardo Gomes Gobbi¹  José Antonio Mancuso Filho¹  Marco Kawamura Demange¹ 

[1] ,USP School of Medicine Hospital das ClínicasSão Paulo SP ,Brazil

关键词: Methodology;    Bibliometrics;    Periodicals;    Orthopedics;    Metodologia;    Bibliometria;    Publicações periódicas;    Ortopedia;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.rbo.2012.06.004

来源: SciELO

【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVE:Profile analysis of articles from scientific journals is rare in our country. The aim of this study was to perform an analysis of publications of the Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (RBO), to specify the designs of the studies and their level of evidence.METHODS:All articles published in RBO from January 2006 to December 2010 were classified according to the design of the study. The clinical studies were further stratified according to the level of evidence, in agreement with the norm of the journal. The studies classified as randomized and controlled clinical trials (RCTs) had their quality assessed by the system proposed by Jadad.RESULTS:In this period, there were 376 articles published in RBO. Clinical studies represented most of the papers, with 60.64% of the total. Case series represented 61.4% of the clinical studies. Thirteen RCTs were published, accounting for 3.46% of the total, and 5.7% of the clinical studies. The analysis of the quality of the RCTs showed that 5 (38.46%) were considered high quality, while 8 (61.54%) were of low quality. Among the studies in which the level of evidence does not apply (non-clinical), non-systematic reviews (46 articles) and basic research (40 articles) have prevailed, representing 12.23% and 10.64% respectively of the total.CONCLUSIONS:Case series were the most prevalent (37.23%) studies published in RBO between 2006 and 2010, while RCTs accounted for 3.46% of the articles. The majority of RCTs (61.54%) were considered low quality, and only 1.32% of the clinical studies were classified as level I evidence.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC-ND   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License