期刊论文详细信息
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Pitfalls in the assessment of murine atherosclerosis
S. Catanozi1  J.c. Rocha1  M. Passarelli1  F.c. Chiquito1  E.c.r. Quintão1  E.r. Nakandakare1 
[1] ,Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina Laboratório de Lípides (LIM 10)São Paulo SP ,Brasil
关键词: Atherosclerosis;    Animal models;    Disease models;    Aorta;    Pathology;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0100-879X2009000600001
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

This review provides examples of the fact that different procedures for the measurement of atherosclerosis in mice may lead to interpretation of the extent of atherosclerosis having markedly different biological and clinical significance for humans: 1) aortic cholesterol measurement is highly sensitive for the detection of early and advanced atherosclerosis lesions, but misses the identification of the location and complexity of these lesions that are so critical for humans; 2) the histological analysis of the aortic root lesions in simvastatin-treated and control mice reveals similar lesion morphology in spite of the remarkable simvastatin-induced reduction of the aortic cholesteryl ester content; 3) in histological analyses, chemical fixation and inclusion may extract the tissue fat and also shrink and distort tissue structures. Thus, the method may be less sensitive for the detection of slight differences among the experimental groups, unless a more suitable procedure employing physical fixation with histological sample freezing using optimal cutting temperature and liquid nitrogen is employed. Thus, when measuring experimental atherosclerosis in mice, investigators should be aware of several previously unreported pitfalls regarding the extent, location and complexity of the arterial lesion that may not be suitable for extrapolation to human pathology.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130078341ZK.pdf 637KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:20次