期刊论文详细信息
Radiologia Brasileira
Positive predictive values of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5 in breast lesions submitted to percutaneous biopsy
Gustavo Machado Badan1  Décio Roveda Júnior1  Carlos Alberto Pecci Ferreira1  Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira1  Eduardo De Faria Castro Fleury1  Mário Sérgio Dantas Do Amaral Campos1  Rodrigo De Oliveira Seleti1  Hélio Da Cruz Júnior1 
关键词: Breast cancer;    BI-RADS;    Percutaneous biopsy;    Positive predictive value;    Histological diagnosis;    Câncer de mama;    BI-RADS;    Biópsia percutânea;    Valor preditivo positivo;    Diagnóstico histológico;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0100-39842013000400006
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objective To evaluate the BI-RADS as a predictive factor of suspicion for malignancy in breast lesions by correlating radiological with histological results and calculating the positive predictive value for categories 3, 4 and 5 in a breast cancer reference center in the city of São Paulo. Materials and Methods Retrospective, analytical and cross-sectional study including 725 patients with mammographic and/or sonographic findings classified as BI-RADS categories 3, 4 and 5 who were referred to the authors' institution to undergo percutaneous biopsy. The tests results were reviewed and the positive predictive value was calculated by means of a specific mathematical equation. Results Positive predictive values found for categories 3, 4 and 5 were respectively the following: 0.74%, 33.08% and 92.95%, for cases submitted to ultrasound-guided biopsy, and 0.00%, 14.90% and 100% for cases submitted to stereotactic biopsy. Conclusion The present study demonstrated high suspicion for malignancy in lesions classified as category 5 and low risk for category 3. As regards category 4, the need for systematic biopsies was observed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130060112ZK.pdf 176KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:10次