期刊论文详细信息
Drug Delivery
A Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of eighteen targeted drugs or drug combinations for pulmonary arterial hypertension
Shangjuan Dong1  Miao Yu2  Xiangchun Zheng3  Sumei Wang3 
[1] Department Respiration, Dongfang Hospital Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, Chin;Department of Emergency, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, China;Department of Emergency, Dongfang Hospital Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China;
关键词: Pulmonary arterial hypertension;    6 minutes walking distance;    functional class;    randomized controlled trial;    network meta-analysis;   
DOI  :  10.1080/10717544.2018.1523257
来源: publisher
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) can be relieved by pharmacological interventions, especially the targeted drug, which is classified into endothelin receptor antagonist, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, prostaglandin I2, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator and selective non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonist. To solve the contradictions existing in reported trials and provide a comprehensive guideline for clinical practice. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. The basic information about the article, trial, arm, intervention, and the detailed data of outcome, including 6 minutes walking distance (6MWD) change, WHO functional class (FC) improvement, Borg dyspnea score (BDS) change, cardiac index (CI) change, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) change, mean right arterial pressure (mRAP) change, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) change, clinical worsening, hospitalization, death, severe adverse events (SAEs), and withdrawal were extracted. The rank of treatments was estimated. 10,230 cases provided the firsthand comparison data about targeted drugs for treating PAH. For 6MWD, ambrisentan + tadalafil, vardenafil, and sildenafil + bosentan were better than others. Epoprostenol, macitentan, and sildenafil represented a greater WHO FC improvement. Vardenafil and treprostinil were better for BDS. So were bosentan + epoprostenol and bosentan alone for CI. Iloprost plus bosentan, bosentan + epoprostenol, and epoprostenol were better for mPAP. Iloprost plus bosentan, bosentan alone, and selexipag could reduce PVR. Sildenafil, epoprostenol, and vardenafil had the highest probability to reduce the incidence of death and withdrawal. To conclude, vardenafil and iloprost + bosentan showed relatively better performance in both efficacy and safety. However, the therapeutic choice should be made according to both the feature of each therapy and the individual condition.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202004239787214ZK.pdf 1432KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:8次