Agronomy | |
Integrated Palmer Amaranth Management in Glufosinate-Resistant Cotton: I. Soil-Inversion, High-Residue Cover Crops and Herbicide Regimes | |
Jatinder S. Aulakh1  Andrew J. Price2  Stephen F. Enloe1  Edzard van Santen1  Glenn Wehtje1  | |
[1]Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA | |
[2] | |
[3]National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36852, USA | |
关键词: cover crops; glufosinate-tolerant cotton; herbicide regimes; soil-inversion; | |
DOI : 10.3390/agronomy2040295 | |
来源: mdpi | |
![]() |
【 摘 要 】
A three year field experiment was conducted to evaluate the role of soil-inversion, cover crops and herbicide regimes for Palmer amaranth between-row (BR) and within-row (WR) management in glufosinate-resistant cotton. The main plots were two soil-inversion treatments: fall inversion tillage (IT) and non-inversion tillage (NIT). The subplots were three cover crop treatments: crimson clover, cereal rye and winter fallow; and sub subplots were four herbicide regimes: preemergence (PRE) alone, postemergence (POST) alone, PRE + POST and a no herbicide check (None). The PRE herbicide regime consisted of a single application of pendimethalin at 0.84 kg ae ha−1 plus fomesafen at 0.28 kg ai ha−1. The POST herbicide regime consisted of a single application of glufosinate at 0.60 kg ai ha−1 plus
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202003190040804ZK.pdf | 237KB | ![]() |