A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing

Animals

Bidda Jones³  Jed Goodfellow³  James Yeates²  Paul D. McGreevy¹ 

[1] Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; E-Mail:;University of Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, UK;RSPCA Australia, P.O. Box 265, Deakin West, ACT 2600, Australia

关键词: equine;    horse;    pain;    racing;    welfare;    whip;   

DOI  :  10.3390/ani5010138

来源: mdpi

【 摘 要 】

This is a critique of the British Horseracing Authority’s 2011 report, A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It analyses the way the report uses science and public opinion research to reach conclusions on the animal welfare impact of whip use. Our analysis suggests that some of the report’s findings are insufficiently defended by the report and that further independent scientific review is needed to reach definitive conclusions about whip use on racehorse welfare.

There is increasing controversy about the use of the whip as a performance aid in Thoroughbred horseracing and its impact on horse welfare. This paper offers a critical analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s (BHA) 2011 Report Responsible Regulation: A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It examines the BHA’s process of consultation and use of science and public opinion research through the application of current scientific literature and legal analysis. This analysis suggests that the BHA’s findings on the welfare impact and justification for whip use are insufficiently defended by the report. These findings indicate that the report is an inadequate basis from which to draw any definitive conclusions on the impact of whips on racehorse welfare. Further review is needed, undertaken by an independent scientific body, to advance this debate.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.