Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

Vaccines

Saranya Sridhar¹  Karl A. Brokstad²  Rebecca J. Cox³ 

[1] Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK;Broeglemann Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; E-Mail:;Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; E-Mail:

关键词: Influenza;    vaccination;    immunization;    live attenuated vaccine;    immunity;    antibodies;    T-cells;   

DOI  :  10.3390/vaccines3020373

来源: mdpi

【 摘 要 】

Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen causing annual outbreaks and occasional pandemics. Influenza vaccination is the major method of prophylaxis. Currently annual influenza vaccination is recommended for groups at high risk of complications from influenza infection such as pregnant women, young children, people with underlying disease and the elderly, along with occupational groups such a healthcare workers and farm workers. There are two main types of vaccines available: the parenteral inactivated influenza vaccine and the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine. The inactivated vaccines are licensed from 6 months of age and have been used for more than 50 years with a good safety profile. Inactivated vaccines are standardized according to the presence of the viral major surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin and protection is mediated by the induction of vaccine strain specific antibody responses. In contrast, the live attenuated vaccines are licensed in Europe for children from 2–17 years of age and provide a multifaceted immune response with local and systemic antibody and T cell responses but with no clear correlate of protection. Here we discuss the immunological immune responses elicited by the two vaccines and discuss future work to better define correlates of protection.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.