Iranian journal of reproductive medicine | |
COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFERS AND FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFERS | |
SHEN CHUNJUAN1  GAO YING1  SHU DEFENG1  ZHAO XIAOJIE1  | |
关键词: IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; CLINICAL OUTCOME; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY; | |
DOI : | |
学科分类:药学、药理学、毒理学(综合) | |
来源: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd | |
【 摘 要 】
Background: Advances in embryo culture technology and cryopreservation have led to a shift in in vitro fertilization (IVF) from early fresh or frozen-thawed cleavage embryo transfer to fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst stage transfer.Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case control study, patients undergoing IVF cycles from January 2012 to December 2012 were enrolled in Assisted Reproduction of Wuhan Union Hospital were enrolled. A total of 1891 cycle contains 1150 fresh embryo transfers and 741 frozen-thawed embryo transfers were studied. All data were transferred directly to SPSS 18 and analyzed.Results: Clinical pregnancy rates of fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers compared with fresh blastocyst transfers, frozen-thawed cleavage-stage embryo transfers, post thaw cleavage-stage extended blastocyst culture transfers and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers were 52.7%, 35.88%, 35.29%, 47.75%, 59.8% in patients under 35 years of ages and 41.24%, 26.92%, 11.32%, 46.15%, 55.8% in patients older than 35 years old, respectively. The multiple pregnancy rates, abortion rates and ectopic pregnancy rates did not differ significantly among the five groups.Conclusion: The clinical pregnancy rates were not different significantly between fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers and fresh blastocyst transfers. But the clinical pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer was the highest among fresh/frozen-thawed embryo transfers.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201912010273268ZK.pdf | 502KB | download |