18F-FDG PET and Combined 18F-FDG–Contrast CT Parameters as Predictors of Tumor Control for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Wen-Yen Huang¹  Cheng-Hsiang Lo¹  Meei-Shyuan Lee¹  Chang-Ming Chen¹  Chia-Hung Kao¹  Wen-Sheng Huang¹  Yee-Min Jen¹  Li-Ping Chang¹  Hsing-Lung Chao¹  Chuang-Hsin Chiu¹ 

关键词: PET;    hepatocellular carcinoma;    stereotactic ablative radiotherapy;    stereotactic body radiotherapy;   

DOI  :  10.2967/jnumed.112.119370

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine

【 摘 要 】

The application of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is emerging. To identify pretreatment prognostic indicators is crucial for patient selection and optimal individual therapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether 18F-FDG PET and a combined 18F-FDG–contrast CT parameter could be useful tools to predict tumor control for patients with HCC treated by SABR. Methods: We retrospectively identified 31 patients (41 tumors) who underwent 18F-FDG PET before SABR between November 2007 and September 2011. 18F-FDG PET parameters were collected as prognostic indicators, including visual PET scale (+/−), maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) of the tumor (TSUVmax), ratio of TSUVmax to maximal normal-liver SUV, ratio of TSUVmax to mean normal-liver SUV, and score combining tumor volume and TSUVmax (CT/18F-FDG PET score). They underwent SABR with a median dose of 42 Gy (ranging from 30 to 50 Gy) in 4–5 fractions. 18F-FDG PET parameters and clinical factors were tested as predictors of tumor control and patient survival. Results: The median follow-up time was 18 mo. Among the parameters examined, TSUVmax and CT/18F-FDG PET score were significantly correlated with tumor control. TSUVmax with a cutoff value of 3.2 was the most significant prognostic indicator. The 4-y control rate was 86.2% in tumors with a TSUVmax of 3.2 or less but only 37.5% in those with a TSUVmax of more than 3.2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–74.76; P = 0.034). CT/18F-FDG PET score (≤4 vs. >4) was also a significant predictor of tumor control after SABR. Tumors with a CT/18F-FDG PET score of more than 4 had a 5.23-fold risk of tumor failure. After adjustment for factors of sex, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score, and Child–Pugh classification, tumors with a score of more than 4 had a 4.96-fold risk of failure after SABR, compared with tumors with a score of 4 or less. For overall survival, none was statistically significant. Conclusion: The use of 18F FDG PET to predict tumor control is feasible. TSUVmax with a cutoff value of 3.2 is the best prognostic indicator. We suggest that 18F-FDG PET may be a reference for prognostic prediction, patient selection, and radiation dose adjustment for HCC patients treated with SABR.

【 授权许可】

Unknown