期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Correlation Between Glycolytic Phenotype and Tumor Grade in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas by 18F-FDG PET
Sarah M. Dry1  Michael E. Phelps1  Johannes Czernin1  David Elashoff1  Fritz C. Eilber1  William D. Tap1  Matthias R. Benz1  Martin S. Allen-Auerbach1 
关键词: sarcoma;    PET;    18F-FDG;    glycolytic phenotype;   
DOI  :  10.2967/jnumed.109.074229
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Society of Nuclear Medicine
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Tumor glycolytic phenotyping can be accomplished with 18F-FDG PET. Tumor 18F-FDG uptake correlates with tumor grade in several cancers. However, the role of 18F-FDG PET for the grading of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) warrants further research. Methods: One hundred two patients (48 men and 54 women; mean age ± SD, 50 ± 17 y) with 12 STS subtypes underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. Tumor 18F-FDG uptake, expressed as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), was compared among subtypes and correlated with histopathologic grade. Two frequently used sarcoma grading systemsthe 3-tier system of the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer [FNCLCC]) and a 2-tier system (low grade vs. high grade)were used. Results: More than 90% of STSs (93/102) exhibited a strong glycolytic phenotype (SUVmax, 2.7–52.2 g/mL). Tumor SUVmax differed significantly among tumor grades (P < 0.001 for the 3- and 2-tier grading systems). The FNCLCC and 2-tier grading systems predicted tumor grade with similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively; P = 0.35). SUVmax differed significantly among histologic subtypes (P = 0.03) in the entire population but not when high-grade STSs were analyzed separately (P = 0.31). Conclusion: The tumor glycolytic phenotype correlated significantly with histologic grade as determined by both the FNCLCC and 2-tier (high vs. low) grading systems. 18F-FDG PET cannot be used to reliably distinguish among grade 2 and 3 STSs (by FNCLCC) and the various subtypes.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201912010197825ZK.pdf 1283KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:2次