期刊论文详细信息
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Use of additives in feed for swine in nursery, growing and finishing phases
Pinto, Marcos Franke2  Pereira, Adriana Aparecida2  Barbosa, Luis Carlos Garibaldi Simon2  Garcia Neto, Manoel2  Araújo, Lúcio Francelino1  Junqueira, Otto Mack2 
[1] USP;UNESP
关键词: antibiotic;    prebiotic;    probiotic;    sodium gluconate;    symbiotic     IntroduçãoA empresa suinícola;    para concorrer de forma participativa no mercado internacional;    deve adaptar-se à tendência de não-utilização de antibióticos;    mesmo conhecendo seus benefícios no desempenho animal;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1516-35982009001200015
学科分类:兽医学
来源: Universidade Federal de Vicosa
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotic and sodium gluconate for swine from 28 to 142 days of age, corresponding to the nursery, growing and finishing phases. One hundred and sixty-eight piglets were used weaned at 21 days in a randomized complete design in 42 pens with four male piglets in each experimental unit with six replications and seven treatments: control basal feed; basal feed + antibiotic; basal feed + probiotic; basal feed + prebiotic; basal feed + probiotic + prebiotic (symbiotic); basal feed + sodium gluconate; basal feed + sodium gluconate + probiotic. The animals performance differed among he treatmentsand was best in the animals that received feed with additive from 28 to 142 days of age. Among the feeds with additive, symbiotic was more efficient, presenting the best results in weight gain and feed conversion. Similarly, the addition of sodium + probiotic, prebiotic and probiotic in the feeds was more efficient than antibiotic addition. The use of the evaluated additives substituting the antibiotics did not harm the or the intestinal morphometry. The combination of probiotic and prebiotic (symbiotic) improves the swine performance in the nursery, growing and finishing phases.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201911300648568ZK.pdf 103KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:9次